July 1, 2002
INTERNATIONAL NOTICE
From Kenneth Roy Nichols
DECLARATION OF DE JURE STATELESS STATUS
EFFECTIVE UPON RENUNCIATION OF MARCH 1 2001

"Allegiance"
Now it becomes necessary to revisit that critical element of citizenship.

· allegiance n 1 a : the obligation of a feudal vassal to his liege lord b (1) : the fidelity owed by a subject or citizen to his sovereign or government
Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary

· allegiance. 1. A citizen's obligation of fidelity and obedience to the government or sovereign in return for the benefits of the protection of the state.
Black's Law Dictionary - Seventh Edition

Lets make this crystal clear; I have no allegiance to the United States.

"Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." (Applause.)
George W. Bush - State of the Union address on September 20, 2002

"Terrorists" or America? It is constructive here to define terrorism.

· terrorism n : the systematic use of terror esp. as a means of coercion
Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary

· terrorism, n. The use or threat of violence to intimidate or cause panic, esp. as a means of affecting political conduct.
Black's Law Dictionary - Seventh Edition

Considering the amount of "panic" created by US bombs, guns, mines, and other weapons of mass destruction. Considering its virtual creation and support for the most brutal thugs and war criminals (bin Laden, Hussein, Pinochet, Suharto, Sharon, etc., etc., etc.). Considering the fact that all this is intended to affect "political conduct" conducive to "foreign investment" interests, specifically American and European "investment." If I were seriously required to choose between these two ridiculous options, I will side with the lesser of the two "evils" and join the "terrorists." Bit strange for me to reconcile this fascinating worldview of yours George. But it just keeps getting better.

"Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. (Applause.) From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime."
George W. Bush - September 20, 2002

Enough said, case closed as it were, the Netherlands are home to a hostile regime harboring at least one terrorist. I'm sure your spineless puppet clones that control many of the positions of power here in Holland will continue to support your noble "War on Terror" and extradite me on whatever bullshit charges you bring against me as necessary.

Clarification of World View
1. I acknowledge the US for what it is, the #1 Terrorist on the Planet with the political goal of total global domination.
2. I acknowledge the US as a Classic Racist State that Happily Embraced the Worst Filth of Nazi Germany post World War II and incorporated them into the fabric of an already disgustingly obscene racist political system (which continues to this day).
3. The US is proven to have experimented on me. I may have likely lost my ability to bear young. And now I can ponder whether I will die a painful death by cancer.
4. The US is the #1 Experimenter on Animals (both human and non-human), including experiments on several hundred thousand of its own citizens in the last decade alone.
5. The US is the #4 State Executioner in the World, behind your good friends China, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq. Good company indeed.
6. I acknowledge the US as the Sole Purveyor of Weapons in Space, all but guaranteeing a "Space Race" with China.
7. By far the US is the #1 Purveyor of Weapons of Mass Destruction.
8. By virtue of your unparalleled military expansion you are clearly the #1 Threat to the Safety and Security of All Life on Planet Earth.
9. The US is so embarrassingly the #1 Hypocrite of All Time, to the point of sheer ridiculousness. "War On Terror", "Rule of Law", Operation "Infinite Justice", "Enduring Freedom", "Just Cause", "Champion of Democracy". "Land of the Free". You must be kidding!
10. The US is #1 Destroyer of the Natural World by virtue of its insane contribution to petroleum use and resource consumption in general, global warming, ozone depletion, bio-diversity loss (extinction), nuclear waste, etc., etc., etc. All of this plunder under the guise of so-called "free trade," and "globalization." The earth has never known a greater enemy.
11. The US is the #1 Destroyer of All Life in the Last Century Period.
12. And for clarity, I have absolutely no allegiance to the United States of America!

Allegiance Hawaii
And if the above wasn't enough, I formally swore my "allegiance" to the de jure Hawaiian Nation in November 1999 (your State Dept. has received the legal documents confirming this). Your own U.S. issued passports say directly on them that you will lose U.S. citizenship "by taking an oath or making a declaration of allegiance to a foreign state." I have done both and more, and your denial of the existence of the Hawaiian "state" directly contradicts PUBLIC LAW 103-150. I remain loyal to the Hawaiian Nation and its truly democratic government. I remain loyal to the kanaka maoli, the aboriginal people of Hawaii, and I will continue to do so. I remain loyal to the primary goal of this nation, which is the peaceful transfer of power from your de facto government to the de jure Hawaiian Government. In other words, my goal is a Free Hawaii. Much of the need for a free Hawaii is for the purpose of removing your 3000+ nuclear weapons housed there. Weapons aimed at virtually every major city in the world. Europe beware.

Historical Facts
But that's just the beginning. I actually think that George Jr. himself has described with admirable accuracy the real America;

"They are the heirs of all the murderous ideologies of the 20th century. By sacrificing human life to serve their radical visions -- by abandoning every value except the will to power -- they follow in the path of fascism, and Nazism, and totalitarianism. And they will follow that path all the way, to where it ends: in history's unmarked grave of discarded lies."
George W. Bush - State of the Union address on September 20, 2002

Of course you were supposedly describing the Taliban, which of course was created by the CIA.

Facts;
The so-called "Land of the Free" has more people in prison than any nation in the history of the world (roughly 2 million). Over 60% are non-violent drug offenders.

500,000 people in the U.S suffered from abusive police treatment in various forms, including physical blows, assaults, or threats with police dogs and guns in 1996 alone.

The United States own Department of Justice indicates that a total of 125 civilians died of maltreatment at the hands of police officers between 1980 and 1995, with only one police officer punished for related crimes.

Since 1990, eight teenagers under 18 years old have been executed, and 60 other juveniles are on "death row."

Over the past decade, the United States executed 30 people suffering mental disorders, including a convicted murderer in Texas with the mental capacity of a seven-year old child.

Between 1973 and 2001, 99 people in 24 States have been released from death rows across the USA after independent investigation proved innocence. Of these 99 "convicted murderers," a collective total of 800 years was spent on death row.

At least 23 known now to be innocent people in America have been executed in the last century.

George W. Bush has signed more death warrants (135) than any US president ever.

Today, blacks account for 12% of the total American population, yet comprise 54.2% of the prison population.

Today, a black man in America faces a nine times greater chance of receiving a death sentence, than a white person convicted for the same crime.

20 million Indians inhabited North America when the American forefathers arrived, and less than 2 million survive today.

The US accounts for less than 5% of the earth's total population and contributes to 25% of the Global Green House Gas emissions and despite this has withdrawn from the Kyoto Protocol aiming to reduce greenhouse gas emissions worldwide. Never mind the fact that tens of millions will die or lose their homes from rising sea levels due to Global Warming.

The US consumes over 40% of the earth's resources.

As the wealthiest nation in the world, the US has ostensibly created the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, somehow resulting in a third world massively indebted to its Western oppressors.

Today, 1% of America's population is in control of more wealth than the total wealth of 90% of the population.

Despite being the wealthiest nation in the world, the U.S. continued to reduce funding for social programs throughout the 1990's in spite of major economic growth during that time.

Today, the divide between rich and poor in the US is staggering, and continues to grow.

The U.S. Census Bureau indicates that 41.7 million Americans lack medical insurance coverage,
but the US military budget does exceed the next closest 15 nations in the world in "defense" spending.

The US maintains over 7000 nuclear weapons directed at virtually every major city on the planet.

The US is the only nation in history, to use atomic weapons on civilian targets… Twice!

The US has far more nuclear weapons than all nations of the world, combined.

Today, the vilest terrorist organization ever known, the CIA is expanding power in the name of the "War on Terror."

The CIA is accountable to nobody.

US "client" states, their puppets, and fanatics such as Saddam Hussein, Noriega, Marcos, Pinochet, Suharto, D'Aubisson, Mobutu, the Shah of Iran, bin Laden and the Taliban were all either trained, financed, and armed by the US or all of the above.

500,000+ children, thus far, have died as a direct result of the US led sanctions in Iraq. Sanctions considered "worth the cause" by former Secretary of State Madeline Albright.

Never mind the fact that the US and its clients are conservatively responsible for the impoverishment, starvation, rape, torture, mutilation, massacre and genocide of tens of millions of people world-wide over the last half century alone.

If Karma exists, the WTC attacks are an ominous sign indeed.

US Opposition to International Human Rights
The fact is that the US refuses to adopt human rights standards accepted throughout the so-called "civilized world." Your nation that beats the drum of "Democracy," "Freedom," "Justice," etc. is truly hostile, and increasingly so towards human rights that are the cornerstone of insuring safety and freedom for all people. Proof again of US rouge behavior intent on a "Rule by Force" policy. And even when it does sign on to human rights laws it invariably agrees only "within the limits of its own laws," which means the agreement is useless. Objection to human rights becomes easy to understand when you realize that the US is the #1 profiteer in regards to the sale of weapons (restraining devices, firearms, grenades, depleted uranium, tanks, helicopters, fighter jets, land mines, chemical and biological weapons, missiles, lasers, etc). This multi-billion dollar industry produces massive revenue. When we understand the magnitude of these profits and its role in global domination we can understand the root of why the US is hostile towards nearly all initiatives for disarmament and peace (1972 ABM Treaty and the recent Global Test Ban Treaty among them). Perhaps there is a connection between the Bush family interest in the defense contractor, the Carlyle Group, and the insane Bush (Jr. & Sr.) policies moving this world towards World War III? Maybe this explains why human rights are so despised by the Bush clan?

Opposition to United Nations Conventions, Security Council Resolutions, and Human Rights Law includes, but is not limited to;

1. The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (opposed until 1994 & ratified only within the limits of its own laws - Meaning it is useless)
2. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (opposed until 1992 & only within the limits of its own laws - useless)
3. The Security Council Resolution condemning International Terrorism (US veto 1987)
4. The Comprehensive Anti-landmine Treaty (opposed - signed by 135 other nations)
5. The Convention on the Rights of the Child (opposed - the only other nation that had not ratified this treaty was Somalia, which had no functioning government).
6. The Abolition of the Use of Child Soldiers (opposed until 2000)
7. The Abolition of Capital Punishment (opposed)
8. The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (opposed)
9. The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (opposed until 1994 & the US just plain walked out of August 2001 UN Conference on Racism)
10. The formation of a binding International Criminal Court (opposed).

As a comparison, the Netherlands has signed on to all of these international treaties and agreements. This is where I live now. And although it is one of the founding members of the Organization of American States, the United States refuses to either approve the American Convention on Human Rights, or sign other human rights conventions the organization has approved.

Now I am wondering to myself if I have made the allegiance issue clear enough? As you have had difficulty understanding this previously, I felt compelled to illustrate more clearly my true feelings. I am hopeful now that you will figure it out this time around, I have no allegiance whatsoever to the US Government!

Renounce #1 - March 1st 2002
I realized long ago that in my loathing of America's horrific contribution to global mass-murder and so much more, that it was the least I could do to remove myself from any association with the US. This process began in 1994 when my knowledge of America's extensive crimes against humanity was reasonably understood. It was at that time of awakening that I knew I would formally renounce my US birth citizenship. Instead of getting angry, I studied history, law, ecology, and philosophy and incorporated all of this into the fabric of my being. The question was not if I would renounce, but when?

"But every man is born free, and therefore the son of a citizen, when arrived at the age of reason, may consider whether it is well for him to join the society in which he happens to be by birth. If he does not find that it is to his advantage to remain in it, he has the right to leave it…"
The Law of Nations

It would be five years later, in 1999 that I commenced to formally renouncing. As a note of interest, the last straw for me was the ongoing genocide of the Hawaiian people via "Blood Quantum", and the all but forgotten Nuclear Test Ban Treaty of 1999, which was supported the world over, and of course, rejected by America. That is when I swore my allegiance to the Hawaiian Nation and ordered your official INFORMATION FOR DETERMINING U.S. CITIZENSHIP, and STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING CONCERNING THE CONSEQUENCES AND RAMIFICATIONS OF RENUNCIATION documents. This process, lengthy and costly as it was, culminated in my sworn Renunciation before Consul Steve Giegerich of the United States Consulate in Vancouver, Canada on March 1, 2001;

· See 13 page attachment. Includes; INFORMATION FOR DETERMINING U.S. CITIZENSHIP form (5 pages), my attachment to said form (2 pages), my DECLARATION OF EXPATRIATION (5 pages), and most interestingly the STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING CONCERNING THE CONSEQUENCES AND RAMIFICATIONS OF RENUNCIATION
(1 PAGE).

It was at this meeting with Consul Giegerich, I affirmed under oath the truth contained within your documents and handed over my US passport. These are the exact documents I have supplied to you within the attachments above, for the third and last time now. Within the original "Declaration of Expatriation" submitted to you March 1, 2001 I made my rights and intent very clear;

Although the United States is fully aware of Hawaii's Reinstated Government and their lawful status, it continues to ignore its existence as it runs contrary to U.S. economic and strategic interests. Understanding this I expect this written declaration to be rejected on the grounds that the United States does not recognize this government. Should the U.S. indeed use this farce of a reason to deny my expatriation I demand now that you usher me into the realm of statelessness that I shall embrace with pride. Remaining a U.S. citizen is simply not an option. - Kenneth Nichols "Declaration of Expatriation"

More than any other reason, I am an enemy of the state because of my loyalty and support for the de jure Hawaiian Nation, so lets revisit the facts in regards to this nation. Starting with your own federal law.

Public Law 103-150
Within my Declaration of Expatriation, UNITED STATES FEDERAL LAW 103-150 is cited. Federal Laws that all federal employees are sworn to uphold;

"Whereas, on January 14, 1893, John L. Stevens (hereafter referred to in this Resolution as the "United States Minister"), the United States Minister assigned to the sovereign and independent Kingdom of Hawaii conspired with a small group of non-Hawaiian residents of the Kingdom of Hawaii including citizens of the United States, to overthrow the indigenous and lawful Government of Hawaii…"

It goes further to say;
"Whereas the indigenous Hawaiian people never directly relinquished their claims to their inherent sovereignty as a people or over their national lands to the United States, either through their monarchy or through a plebiscite or referendum…"

Where else but America can a thief confess to a crime, with the thief left to keep the stolen property? Your law affirmed it; you stole Hawaiian nation by force, and the Hawaiian people (kanaka maoli) never gave their nation to you. Quite simple really, there is nothing to debate, PUBLIC LAW 103-150 makes it clear, and as a result, I answer to the government of the nation you admitted to stealing. Quite logical when you think about it.

It is now my honor to serve you with further proof of the lawful existence of the Kingdom of Hawaii. Attached is a copy of a legal notice that appeared in the legal notice section as required in the Honolulu Advertiser on September 9, 2001 (1 page). We all remember what happened two days later. In this notice it states the facts I have just summarized and further states that Kingdom of Hawaii has "manifested perfect right to exercise the rule of postliminium in accordance with international public law." It further stated that the "government de jure of the Hawaiian Kingdom possesses the authority to reclaim any and all land within its territorial boundaries." Something of interest to you I would think. Remember PUBLIC LAW 103-150?

"Whereas the indigenous Hawaiian people never directly relinquished their claims to their inherent sovereignty as a people or over their national lands to the United States, either through their monarchy or through a plebiscite or referendum…"

This notice was legally served to your State Department and also served to local real estate agents, police, politicians and others notifying them that the U.S. Government had been served notice and had 30 days to "Object" as prescribed by law. Your government did not object so there is no debate on the perfect rights of the de jure Hawaiian Kingdom. But just for good measure I shall remind you by serving this notice once again but with international media and the world as our witness. If you have any objections than you can do so by contacting Prime Minister Noa in Hawaii.

US Response Lawful Renunciation #1
Despite federal laws you are sworn to uphold I received a letter dated August 8th, 2001 from the American Citizen Services Unit in Vancouver, signed by Consul Christine Harold Aluyen notifying me that my passport would be "returned" with an explanation to follow. Subsequently a letter dated August 13th, 2001 from the United States Department of State, signed by Division Chief, Western Hemisphere Affairs, American Citizen Services and Crisis Management Ian G. Brownlee announced that "we cannot approve the Certificate of Loss of Nationality." The reason stated was that;

The Department has adopted a position that the intention to relinquish U.S. nationality for purposes of Section 349(a) of the INA does not exist where a renunciant plans or claims a right to reside in the United States, a right inherent in U.S. nationality, unless a renunciant demonstrates that residence will be as an alien properly documented under U.S. law.

The State Department simply ignored all reference to PUBLIC LAW 103-150 in my declaration and the undisputed facts of Hawaiian history that make it clear that the US is the de facto authority. Of course I am fully aware that you can never voluntarily acknowledge the existence of the de jure Hawaiian government, to do so would force a transition of powers. Since this government is not cowardly puppets motivated by greed, you will have nothing to do with them, yet they are there, and are not going away. Hawaii as far as the US is concerned, is stolen property that it intends to hold by force. I challenge your almighty power to state just one of objection to the existence of a de jure Hawaiian Government in the year 2002. Please, deny it exists; challenge its lawful authority, whatever? Of course the mighty bully who loves to spout all sorts of nonsense will keep their mouths conspicuously shut in regards to this subject, won't you?

Jurisdiction
In law, jurisdiction has everything to do with authority.

· jurisdiction n 1 : the power, right, or authority to interpret and apply law 2 : the authority of a sovereign power to govern or legislate 3 : the limits or territory within which authority may be exercised
Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary
· jurisdiction, n. 1. A government's general power to exercise authority over all persons and things within its territory. 2. A geographic area within which political or judicial authority may be exercised.
Black's Law Dictionary - Seventh Edition

I respected and acknowledged the de jure Government of Hawaii, not the inferior de facto INA?

· de facto 1 : exercising power as if legally constituted 2 : ACTUAL - compare DE JURE
· de jure : by right ; of right : by a lawful title
Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary
· de facto 1. Actual; existing in fact; having effect even though not formally or legally recognized. 2. Illegitimate but in effect.
· de jure Existing by right or according to law.
Black's Law Dictionary - Seventh Edition

The fact is that I had no requirement by Public International Law, or Hawaiian Kingdom Law, to report to you. Simply put; "you" and the INA are nothing more than de facto agencies with no regard for even your own laws, much less those of the world. Why in the hell should I report to you? Your bullshit INA laws would only have jurisdiction over those within territories "lawfully" under your control, which aint Hawaii. Sorry for you. If I had reported to your INA it would have made a mockery of the de jure Hawaiian authority and compromised its integrity. I would sooner go to jail than betray my Hawaiian brothers and sisters by reporting to your INA as an alien in Hawaii.

15 Statutes at Large, Chapter 249 (Section 1)
Enacted July 27, 1868, one day before the 14th Amendment was declared "ratified". CHAP. CCXLIX. -- An Act concerning the Rights of American Citizens in foreign States Whereas the right of expatriation is a natural and inherent right of all people, indispensable to the enjoyment of the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and whereas in the recognition of this principle this government has freely received emigrants from all nations, and invested them with the rights of citizenship; and whereas it is claimed that such American citizens, with their descendants, are subjects of foreign states, owing allegiance to the governments thereof; and whereas it is necessary to the maintenance of public peace that this claim of foreign allegiance should be promptly and finally disavowed: Therefore, Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That any declaration, instruction, opinion, order, or decision of any officers of this government which denies, restricts, impairs, or questions the right of expatriation, is hereby declared inconsistent with the fundamental principles of this government.

This act has never been repealed and is yet another law affirming my right to renounce. You have hidden it from the public view in order to maintain your citizen enslavement via the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. Soon people will know that the rights protected by the Constitution do not apply to them as federal citizens and that only by renouncing citizenship can they retain these rights. This is why you have tried so hard to deny me this right.

The Constitution of the United States of America
I would refer you to your so-called "supreme Law of the Land;" The Constitution of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

Citizens, Subjects = Slaves
In order for any government to grab power and maintain it, it must have "subjects" or "citizens". According to Black's Law Dictionary (Sixth Edition), "Citizens are members of a political community who, in their associated capacity, have established or submitted themselves to the dominion of a government for the promotion of their general welfare and the protection of their individual as well as collective rights. (Herriot v. City of Seattle, 81 Wash.2d. 48, 500 P.2d. 101, 109)" So, by declaration of the 14th Amendment, all persons born from that point forward, and all naturalized people, had just become citizens (i.e. subjects) of the United States Government, obviously without their knowledge (babies) or understanding (the Negroes). The Federal Government had just reached past the jurisdictional boundaries of the state and county lines and claimed all its babies and all Negroes. In Section 2, it then states that only males 21 years of age who are citizens of the United States may be allowed to vote in Federal and State elections. That means that only those men who willingly claimed U.S. citizenship on voter's registration cards (though they didn't realize the implications) were also brought in as subjects of the Federal Government.
L. C. Lyon - The Day Our Country Was Stolen:
How the 14th Amendment Enslaved Us All Without a Shot Fired

And here all this time the American people thought citizenship and voting was a good thing.

ARTICLE VI - This Constitution, and all the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby,…"

Unless you were fraudulently duped into giving up your rights in order to vote or get a drivers license or get a social security card or simply have a birth certificate.

ARTICLE 1 Section 8. The Congress shall have Power To define and punish Piracies and Felonies on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations.

The key word here being "shall".

Shall, in all its ambiguity, is a wonderful word for deception in law. Apparently shall in this case means;

ARTICLE 1 Section 8. The Congress shall have the Power To (not) define and (not) punish Piracies and Felonies on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations.

What is the Law of Nations, aside from a document recognized in your supreme law of the land? It is what's referred to as International Law (or Public International Law).

The Law of Nations is the science of rights, which exist between Nations or States, and of the obligations corresponding to these rights.
The Law of Nations - Introduction

The United States Supreme Court has declared, "international law is part of our law." Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, one of your most respected political figures and four time Senator has even wrote a book about the Law of Nations, in the book he states that the Law of Nations was;

"set forth as the foundation of our national existence," and further stated;

"In the annals of forgetfulness there is nothing quite to compare with the fading from the American mind of the idea of the law of nations."
Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan - "On the Law of Nations."

The continued hostility towards international law and in this case towards your legal commitments to the Law of Nations belies the fact that your Constitution is yet another fraudulent document intended to provide the illusion of law. I have only cited it as a means of exposing the lie that it is. The US is truly a lawless society. It is illuminating however to examine the words within the Constitution and the Law of Nations and contrast them with the reality.

Lawful Hawaiian Citizenship
Congress, and the then President Clinton confessed to the theft of the Hawaiian Nation and now blatantly ignore the Reinstatement of its Lawful Authority in response. Thus injuring the rights of Lawful Hawaiian Citizens and therefore the right of all kanaka maoli in Hawaii. This is of course no surprise; the beast you represent violates virtually all rights essential to peace and justice. This does not change the facts however. By all rights, I had no requirement whatsoever, by law or otherwise, to leave Hawaii in order to physically divorce myself of US citizenship and affirm my lawful status as a Hawaiian citizen,… but I did.

ARTICLE 15 - (1) "Everyone has the right to a nationality." (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality." - United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights

You ignore my Hawaiian citizenship because you fear truth and justice even more than bombs and "terrorists." This is why you will not utter one word in response to my claim that the Hawaiian Nation and its de jure authority have been reinstated. It seems your almighty power by the rule of force has painted you into a corner. Making things even worse for your attempt to treat me as your property and deny my right to renounce is that now, I do not even live in the US, and have stated quite emphatically that I have no plan to return. And furthermore I know that if I did I would almost assuredly end up in prison or worse.

Renounce #2 - November 26th 2001
On November 26, 2001, I repeated my renunciation actions by filling out nearly identical documents to those signed in Vancouver on March 1, 2001. At that time I relinquished passport # 120689595, for the second and last time. And once again, for the last time, swore under oath my renunciation of US citizenship.

Now we must re-examine your STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING CONCERNING THE CONSEQUENCES AND RAMIFICATIONS OF RENUNCIATION. It states;

1. I, Kenneth Roy Nichols have the right to renounce my United States citizenship.
2. I am exercising my right of renunciation freely and voluntarily without force, compulsion, or undue influence placed upon me by any person.
3. If I do not possess the nationality/citizenship of any country other than the United States, upon my renunciation I will become a stateless person and may face extreme difficulties in traveling internationally and entering most countries.
4. My renunciation may not affect my liability, if any, to prosecution for any crimes which I may have committed or may commit in the future which violate United States law.
5. My renunciation may not exempt me from United States income taxation. With regard to United States taxation consequences, I understand that I must contact the United States Internal Revenue Service. Further, I understand that if my renunciation of United States citizenship is determined by the United States Attorney General to be motivated by tax avoidance purposes, I will be found excludable from the United States under the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended.
6. The extremely serious and irrevocable nature of the act of renunciation has been explained to me by Consul Steve Giegerich at the American Consulate General at Vancouver. I fully understand its consequences.

One. I formally renounced on March 1, 2001.
Two. I have never felt more free and clear-headed than when I exercised this right.
Three. I do proudly possess nationality/citizenship with the Hawaiian Nation, but for simplicities sake, I have embraced my Stateless status with pride.
Four - Criminal Activity?
I have committed only one crime, that of defending my freedom and exposing your lies. But I am sure your cowardly CIA, FBI, and your other numerous agents of oppression can arrange something. Interpret item #4 literally and I can continue be charged (framed) for US crimes regardless of where the alleged crime is committed, even if outside US Territorial Jurisdiction. That's quite handy. To that I have just two words for you; POLITICAL PRISONER.
Five - Tax Liability?
The 16th Amendment to your "Supreme Law" Constitution that attempted to tax all US citizens (not just federal citizens) was never ratified. Contrary to the highly illegal threats of the Federal Government via the IRS, your own Constitution, the Internal Revenue Service's own mandate (Internal Revenue Code), and the United States Supreme Court have all repeatedly upheld that; "Federal Income Tax is VOLUNTARY!" The only occasions I ever complied with your fraudulent tax system was because I was stupid beyond belief, and/or fearful of reprisal in the form of illegal property seizure, fines, imprisonment, etc. and was obviously "under duress". The IRS ruthlessly threatens people by claiming citizens tax liability is based on their "voluntary" compliance with the tax procedure. But I was not a member of the US military (since 1992), a resident of the District of Columbia, a federal employee, a resident of a US colony (Puerto Rico, Guam, etc.), and therefore do dot fall under federal jurisdiction, meaning I am not liable unless I "voluntarily" comply. Voluntary compliance is then fraudulently claimed by the IRS on the basis of citizens entering into "contracts" in the form of filling out IRS tax forms and INS immigration forms, obtaining a social security # or drivers license. In signing these forms and licenses citizens are ignorantly entering into federal jurisdiction and relinquishing all civil rights. In law however, fraud automatically nullifies all contracts, and that would include the "contracts" needed simply to live. Filled out or not, these so-called contracts are in no way binding under law. Even your own document states; "My renunciation may not exempt me from United States income taxation." It "may not" because I am only liable as a federal citizen, otherwise everyone would be liable. Simply put, the IRS is completely without jurisdiction. Furthermore, the IRS with government support continues to commit fraud against its own people. But perhaps that issue would be best discussed in an international court so all American's can know the truth. Please, I beg your challenge on this. And as for your Racist, Civil Rights Destroying Attorney General - Ashcroft, please communicate to him to kiss my ass and exclude me. If he has any balls, he must exclude me. I want to be the next (only?) excludable one. Aside from all the above facts, even if I were liable under the law to pay for your nuclear weapons, corporate welfare, global rape etc., through federal income tax, I would sooner go to jail. When laws compel you to fund horrendous domestic and foreign policies that destroy lives it is every moral persons obligation to defy such laws, and I encourage all people to do just that.
Six. I think my seriousness speaks for itself, and Steve explained it all to me anyway. That's why I signed it, under no duress. To that I have one word; FREEDOM!

"The United States of Hypocrisy"
"As we defend our security after the tragic events of September 11, we have placed the preservation of human rights and democracy at the foundation of our efforts. We also have recommitted ourselves to recognizing and eliminating the conditions in which terrorism is bred and where freedom lies dormant."

"Our commitment to human rights is not new. The United States took the lead in furthering the realization of universal human rights worldwide in the last half of the 20th century. The Department of State's Country Reports on Human Rights Practices are a tangible manifestation of our deep and abiding belief in and commitment to the universality of human rights. They also remind those of us who believe in human freedom and the rule of law of the challenges that lie before us at the beginning of this century." - Colin L. Powell - Secretary of State of the United States

"The U.S. Government's steadfast commitment to human rights and democracy was left unshaken by September 11. Indeed these events further strengthened our resolve to help ensure these rights for people everywhere. We will continue to press for human rights, democratic processes, and civil liberties in all countries using the range of tools available to us."
Lorne W. Craner - Asst. Secretary of State of the United States
Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor

"As we defend our security after the tragic events of September 11, we have placed the preservation of human rights and democracy at the foundation of our efforts." Well if Colin Powell says human rights are at the foundation of the government I would imagine that I have made my human rights quite well understood.

Throughout our ongoing dialogue I have asked many questions of you, challenged your authority, attacked your honor and integrity along with all who are complicit in America's New World Order. I have otherwise made a mockery of your entire government. And now I ask you, after all this:

Does the State Department of State of the United States, Still Consider Me a United States Citizen???
According to Vice Consul Risch, in our April 4, 2002 telephone conversation, it appears that the Department of State is for some reason reluctant to acknowledge my right to renounce;

- Mr. Risch: No, there's no way to compel them (to acknowledge my right to renounce). I will tell you that it is my understanding, that there were some questions and that's why I talked to you that one time. (asking; "If I had intentions to return to the US"). Without having any other nationality, it's unlikely that they will approve it. … tell you that right now;
-
- Mr. Nichols: Why does their own document (the famous STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING CONCERNING THE CONSEQUENCES AND RAMIFICATIONS OF RENUNCIATION) … say that (cut off)
-
- Mr. Risch: I have no idea. Don't ask me cause I don't know. You're talking to the mailbox. All I know is that's what they told me. I didn't want to lie to you and mislead you. They told me they think it's weak (my renunciation) and that they haven't acted … and I'm waiting too …;

How long could that take I asked?

- Mr. Risch: Years;

- Mr. Nichols: They can take years;

- Mr. Risch: They can do whatever they want to do, yes;

Boy that kind of honesty is hard to come by in the US government.

Hidden Agenda of the US for Kenneth Nichols
But why in the world would the US want to deny me this right? You would think the Department of State would love to get rid of me. I'm totally lacking in patriotism, I'm not a "hero", and I think America's government is a pathetic joke filled with soulless individuals who sell their own children's future for money and power. But then again, if you know what motivates the beast that is America today, you can determine the answer to such questions. What is the main goal of the US? Power and Control. Why keep me as a US citizen? Because I then remain within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the United States regardless of where I reside on this planet, and therefore subject to its laws. Until death do we part? Absolutely not. I am stateless regardless of your "decision" (or lack thereof). You can only control your paperwork and your "decisions"; you have long since lost control of me.

I Am Not Your Property, Not Your Puppet, Nor Your Citizen. I Am Stateless!
I am as much humored by your ridiculous renunciation process, as I am annoyed by it. So it is time for you to decide between two options;

1. You can tap dance for me once again, amaze me with your creative justifications for keeping your precious son of America. Give me some of that pathetic "interpretation" of law crap that suits you so well.
2. Or maybe you just want to remain silent, "take the fifth" as it were and slither your way back into the halls of the federal government without objection.

Up to you? If you chose the former, once again you have 30 days from the date of delivery on July 1, 2002 to object in order for it to have any legal merit. If you do not object, this legal notice will destroy any such attempt by the United States to claim at a later date that I am a US citizen. Aside from this INTERNATIONAL NOTICE and Declaration being legally served to Vice-Consul William Margenhoff (and therefore your entire government) at the US Consulate in Amsterdam on May 1, 2002, it will also be submitted to numerous embassies or foreign affairs departments including but not limited to; the Hawaiian, Chinese, Dutch, New Zealand, Indian, Irish, and Cuban Governments. In addition to those governments it will also be submitted to numerous human rights and refugee organizations, my attorney Peter Bogaers, and national and international media agencies around the world. Make no mistake about it, this notice is a legally binding document that adheres to the "rule of law" and no response from your government within the 30 days is legally sufficient to prove "tacit consent" on the United States Governments behalf. At that point there will be absolutely no question as to my political status. Furthermore, I will be burning passport #034552463 outside of your Consulate to further clarify my absolute void of U.S. allegiance. This passport you will remember, was reported lost by myself in January 2000. Indeed it was lost and then found earlier this year in old clothing that had been in storage. I realize that this is not a valid passport but the symbolic value of burning it could not be denied since you have so pathetically tried to deny my Self Determination to define my political status. If you had simply honored my rights I would not have done this. You have only yourselves and your disgraceful government policies to blame for this.

Sowing Seeds
For those in the US government who read this, I encourage you to follow your heart. In the inevitable battle for global justice, even patriotic intelligence agents, bureaucrats, and politicians alike have a place in a world governed by sanity and compassion, and many of them are already speaking out. By continuing your all to necessary role thus fulfilling the current 21st Century agenda of global domination for your masters, you doom yourself, and most shamefully, your children. May your conscience rise to the occasion?

Conclusion
In this document I have provided evidence above and beyond what is necessary to exercise my rights as a human being. I have announced plans to bring serious charges against the UNITED STATES. I have voluntarily put my life at risk in order to be able to look myself in the mirror and not feel shame. I can honestly say that I am at absolute peace with myself and I fear no entity whatsoever. You and your government are vile disgusting killers and people like myself have been and will continue to be attacked because we refuse to acquiesce or participate in your wretched policies.

Having said all this I do not hate you or America. I have no hatred period, although I know you would prefer it that way. Mostly I feel sorry for the Bush family and the rest of the power mongers who rule this world, for now. They are all truly tormented people with a twisted set of values that attempts to disconnect them from the Universal Kinship that unites us all.

I see the problems of this world as human problems and I know that even the U.S. has no monopoly on that. Instead of hate it is love that calls me to the words and actions herein. I have at my young age become wise enough to know the secret to immortality, energy never dies, it simply transfers. No matter what happens to my physical being I have already touched so many by my life's work and love that I cannot be killed. In fact, if any harm does come to me it only assures that my energy will flourish. I am connected to the Universal Kinship and I feel the pleasure and pain of all my brothers and sisters in human and non-human form. I am a rich man in the truest sense. I see and feel the mass awakening you so fear and its inertia is that of a million locomotives traveling at the speed of light. This world is in the final stages of a revolution that will right the wrongs of the past and create a New World Order of peace and harmony, once and for all. The question is, will you be joining us?

Sincerely,

Kenneth Roy Nichols

"Loyalty to petrified opinion, never yet broke a chain or freed a human soul." - Mark Twain